VINEET KOTHARI
RAM LAL – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDER SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE cross-appeals arise out of the impugned judgment and decree dated 15-3-1989 awarding damages to the Plalntiff Mahender Singh s/o Girraj Prasad on account of malicious prosecution by the defendant Ram Lal s/o Manna Ram in a criminal case under Section 302, IPC.
( 2 ) THE claimant-Mahender Singh clalmed damages to the extent of Rs. 31,000/- in the said civil suit, whereas the learned trial court has granted the decree to the extent of Rs. 11,500/- deciding the issue Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6a in favour of the Plalntiff.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the Plalntiff-Mahender singh, around 14-1-1973, Pooran Singh son of defendant Ram Lal committed suicide in nadbai, District Bharatpur and after the post-mortem of the dead body recovered from a well in the village, the body was handed over to the defendant Ram Lal, which was cremated on 18-1-1973 and thereafter on 27-1-1973, the defendant-Ram lal filed a FIR falsely implicating the Plalntiff-Mahender Singh and his father Girraj prasad, who was a medical practitioner in the said town and they had to face criminal trial for over three years and had to remain in custody in connection with the same for a period of about three months from
REFERRED TO : G. Jayaprakash v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
M. Verappa v. Evelyn Sequeira and Ors
Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair
Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan v. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair
State of Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.