SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 202

DAVE, K.N.WANCHOO
GANGADHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.SHARMA, R.A.GUPTA

Judgment

WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Gangadhar under Article 226 of the Constitution of india for a writ of certiorari and prohibition against an order of the Custodian of evacuee Property, Rajasthan, and has arisen in the following circumstances.

( 2 ) ON the basis of an anonymous petition dated the 7th October, 1948, two bullocks were seized by the Sub Inspector of Police at a mela at Bharatpur. Enquiries started in connection with these bullocks, and it was said that they belonged to certain Muslims of village Sonoti, who had left for Pakistan. During the course of these enquiries, allegations were made that Gangadhar applicant and Prabhu, one of the opposite parties, who were the persons in, whose possession the two bullocks had been found, had looted the houses of Muslims of Sonoti along with others after these Muslims had run away. On these allegations, the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Property started an enquiry about the alleged looting. Eventually, on the 22nd of September, 1950, the Deputy custodian, Bharatpur, decided the matter. He ordered that the two bullocks should remain in the custody of the Supurddar, presumably with the idea that they would be






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top