SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Raj) 117

WANCHOO
MADHOSINGH – Appellant
Versus
JAITPALSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amritraj, Hastimal

Judgment

WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a second appeal by Madhosingh and Jatendrasingh against the order of the Civil and Additional Sessions Judge, Balotra, and has arisen, in the following circumstances.

( 2 ) A suit was filed by the appellants for Rs. 3,100/- on 23-7-1946, in the court of the Judicial Superintendent, Malanee. The suit included two distinct claims based on two separate causes of action. There was an objection as to multifarious-ness. Thereupon the court ordered in May 1947 that the plaint should be amended, and allowed 14 days time to do so.

( 3 ) IN July 1947, the appellants filed two drafts of two plaints--one for Rs. 2,000/and odd, and the other for Rs. 800/- and odd, separating the claims arising out of the two causes of action. The court again ordered the appellants to choose as to which case they wanted to remain in that court, and which they wanted to withdraw. The appellants applied on the 18-11-1947, that they wanted to keep the suit for Rs. 2000/- and odd in that court, and wanted to withdraw the suit for Rs. 800/- and odd with permission to bring a fresh suit. Thereupon, on 26-11-1947, the appellants were allowed to withdraw their claim with respect t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top