SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Raj) 130

WANCHOO, BAPNA
KEWAL MAL SINGHI – Appellant
Versus
HETA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.N.Chhangani, Mansha Ram, Noratan Mal

Judgment

WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Kewal Mal Singhi under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus and certiorari and prohibition or any of these or any other order that may be appropriate to be issued to the State of Rajasthan.

( 2 ) THE facts, on which the present petition is based, are these. The applicant was serving as Section Superintendent in the Audit Department of the former state of Jodhpur under an order of appointment of the Finance Minister of jodhpur, and under the Rules of service operative in Jodhpur on the 1st november, 1948. Under these Rules, he was entitled to continue in service till the completion of the age of 55 years, and was a permanent member of the public services of the former Jodhpur State. On the formation of the present state of Rajasthan on the 7th of April, 1949, the applicant continued to be employed in the service of the State of Rajasthan from that date in the Audit department on a salary of Rs. 168/- per month in the grade of Rs. 120-6-180, and thus held a civil post under the State of Rajasthan. In May, 1949, however, the Government of Rajasthan laid down certain procedure and principles to





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top