SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 219

ARUN KUMAR, PRAKASH TATIA
STATE BANK OF BIKANER, JAIPUR – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL WAHID – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAGDISH VYAS, O.P.Pungalia, P.K.BHANSALI, S.S.Purohit

Judgment


ARUN KUMAR, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of cases has been placed before. us in view of a reference order made by the learned single judge. The following issue was referred to a larger Bench:"whether the decision in S. B. Civil First appeal No. 40 of 1998, Central Bank of India v. Aman Travels and others, decided on august 9, 1988 correctly decides the question of payment of interest under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure?"

( 2 ) WHEN this matter had earlier been placed before this Court orders had been passed for issuance of notice to the High court Bar Association, Jodhpur for assisting the Court in deciding the issue. However, at the time of hearing none has appeared for the High Court Bar Association or from the side of the respondents.

( 3 ) WE have heard learned counsel. The issue involved is of a purely legal nature and, therefore, individual facts of the cases are not material. The basic facts necessary for purposes of appreciating the controversy which are common in all the cases are that the appellants had filed suits for recovery of money against the respondents. The suits were filed by appellants on account of failure of the defendants/borrowers to repay th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top