SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 674

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
DANJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Purohit, D.S.RAJVI, J.L.PUROHIT, L.R.Mehta, Prakash Tatia

Judgment


BHAGWATI PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER in this writ petition has raised a grievance regarding 500 sq. meters of land, which was allotted to him by a resolution of the Municipal Board, Mt. Abu dated 29-6-1964 for 7 years vide Annex. 1. After the land was allotted to petitioner vide Annex. 1 he was handed over the possession of the land on 1-4-1966. Petitioner after obtaining the possession of the land started running a Tea Stall on the said land.

( 2 ) A notice was issued by the Tahsildar, Abu Road to petitioner enquiring about the allotment of the land to petitioner. Copy of the notice has been submitted by the petitioner as Annex. 3. Petitioner appeared before the Tehsildar pursuant to the notice Annex. 3 and submitted about the allotment of land and the possession given to him. The Tehsildar (Revenue) Abu Road initiated proceedings against the petitioner. These proceedings concluded by the Tehsildar by observing that the land was given to the petitioner by the Municipal Board on lease of 7 years. The Tahsildar also held that the land belongs to the State Government though the same is situated within the municipal limits. The Tehsildar observed that the land can be allotted
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top