SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 24

MOHD.YAMIN
SHYAMLAL – Appellant
Versus
MANSHA BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Haidar Agha, R.P.SARASVAT

Judgment


MOHD. YAMIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order of learned Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur dated 13-5-97 by which he ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 350/- per month to each of his children Rinku and Kirti from the date of application submitted under Sec. 125, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

( 3 ) MANSHA Bai was married to Shyamlal. Out of this wedlock two children were born. It was alleged in the petition that the wife and two minor children were kicked out of the house by the petitioner and he was not maintaining them for last 7 years. They were kicked out without any cause and have been neglected by the petitioner. He has refused to maintain them. The minor children Rinku and Kirti were living with their mother who was living with her mother as her father has already expired. They do not have any source of income and are unable to maintain themselves. The petitioner was a railway employee and was earning Rs. 2300/- per month and has nobody to look after. Therefore, it was submitted that Rs. 500/- be paid as maintenance allowance to each of three. The husband submitted hi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top