SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 493

ARUN MADAN
MANGU RAM – Appellant
Versus
PURAN MAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.BHANDARI, G.G.Sharma, R.P.Pawa, Sunil Sharma

Judgment


ARUN MADAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is the maternal grand-father of the child Urmila aged about 7 years has moved this court by way of revision petition against the interim order dated 6. 10. 199 3 of Addl. District Judge neem-Ka-Thana in Case No. 13/93 whereby the said court had directed the petitioner to hand-over the custody of female child Urmila to the father (non-petitioner) against whom investigation is reported to be pending with the local police on account of murder of his wife. The petitioner has sought the relief to the effect claiming that the custody of the said child who is already with the petitioner should continue to remain with him since the welfare, upkeep and further development of the said child has in no way been effected and he has made all sincere efforts to look after the said child in all possible manner to the best of his ability by looking after her health and education.

( 2 ) THE facts which are relevant for deciding the controversy between the parties briefly stated are that the petitioners late daughter smt. Rama Devi was married to non-petitioner according to Hindu Rites and ceremony on 8th June 1987 at District Nagaur Rajasthan. The pe















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top