SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 492

ARUN MADAN
MITTHU LAL – Appellant
Versus
KUNDAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Mehta, S.R.Surana

Judgment


ARUN MADAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been preferred before this Court by the defendant-appellant who is a tenant in the suit property, situated at Ramlila Nohara Marg, Lalan Gali, Diggi Mohalla, Beawar, bearing Municipal No. 6/335 (old) block No. 1, new Municipal No. 5 which was earlier in the joint ownership of Ghadisiram alias Ghanshyam Dass Agrawal and Ramlal son of Gadhsiram residents of Jaipur and the said property was constructed in 5 blocks, one out of which is in ownership of present respondents, against the judgment and decree dated 8-7-1996 passed in first appeal No. 58/88 by Addl. District Judge, Beawar against the judgment and decree dated 24-5-1988 passed by Munsiff, Beawar in civil suit No. 46/82 whereby the said appellate court had reversed the judgment and decree of the trial Court. The said property was purchased by the plaintiff-respondent on 21-1-1979 by a registered sale deed and in the meanwhile the appellant who was already inducted as a tenant by the earstwhile owner of the said property continued as a tenant in the aforesaid room and continued his tenancy by attornment by the second owner. i. e. the respondent herein.

( 2 ) THE facts which ar

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top