SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 835

M.G.MUKHERJI, B.S.CHAUHAN
KAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
USHA RANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M.SARASVAT, K.L.JASMATIA, M.S.SINGHVI, P.C.SHARMA, U.S.CHAUDHARY

Judgment


B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS contempt petition was heard along with the main writ petition No. 198/94 as being linked with the said writ petition. The opposite party No. 1 had filed an F. I. R. against petitioners on 29-3-1992 and on her request, the Deputy Secretary, Home, passed an order dated 14-10-1993 to transfer the investigation from one officer to another. However, the said order was not given effect to and the police report was filed before the competent Court, by the Investigation Officer, who had been restrained to investigate vide order dated 14-10-93. However, the same was rejected by the Court vide order dated 26-10-1993 which directed another officer to investigate the case as per earlier order dated 14-10-1993. Order dated 26-10-1993 was also not complied with. The competent criminal Court issued proceedings for contempt vide order dated 30-3-1994. Applicants filed writ petition No. 198/1994 wherein by way of passing an interim order dated 10-5-1994 this Court stayed operation of orders dated 14-10-1993, 26-10-1993 and 30-3-1994 till further orders.

( 2 ) THE non-petitioner No. 1 filed another F. I. R. on 30-3-1995 as contained in Annexure R1/2 to this pet






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top