SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 310

R.R.YADAV, J.R.CHOPRA
KISHANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.BOHRA, T.S.CHAMPAVAT

Judgment


CHOPRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Rajsamand, dated 28- 4-1989, whereby the learned Judge has held the accused-appellants Kishansingh, Bhomsingh and Sawaisingh guilty of the offence under Sections, 302, 460 and 323, IPC and, has, however, acquitted them of the offence under Section 307, IPC. For the offence under Section 302, IPC, each one of them has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment together with a fine of Rs. 200. 00. For offence under Section 460, IPC, each one of them has been sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment together with fine of Rs. 100. 00- and, for offence under Section 323, IPC, each one of them has been sentenced to undergo one years rigorous imprisonment. All the substantive sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. In default of payment of fine of Rs. 200. 00, they have been ordered to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment each and for default in payment of fine of Rs. 100. 00, they have been ordered to undergo 3 months simple imprisonment each.

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal, briefly stated, are - that on 24-3-19























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top