SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 173

S.N.BHARGAVA, G.K.SHARMA
NARSU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.Rastogi, JAGDIP DHANKAR, R.M.LODHA, RIZAN ALVI

Judgment


BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed challenging the conviction and sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Alwar, u/s. 304-A, I. P. C.

( 2 ) THIS revision petition came up for admission. Learned single Judge (Mrs. Kapur, J.) was of the opinion that it does not call for any interference in revision with regard to the merits of the case but she admitted the revision petition on the ground of sentence in view of a decision of this court in Amar Lal v. State of Raj. (S. B. Criminal Revn. Petn. No. 65/83, decided on 6-5-87 : (reported in 1988 Cri LJ 1 ). When this revision petition came up for final disposal before Honble V. S. Dave, J. after hearing the arguments at length, he passed detailed order dated 27-7-87 referring the following question for consideration by the larger bench. "whether the decision in the aforesaid case lays down a general proposition that in all automobile accident cases there should not be a lesser punishment than one years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 15,000/-" ? therefore, this matter has come up before us. Since this is a very important question, we thought it proper to issue notice to the learned counsel, in






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top