SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 180

S.C.AGARWAL
RADHEY SHYAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.G.Sharma

Judgment


S. C. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) RADHEY Shyam Sharma, the petitioner in this writ petition, is Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mangiabas. Certain complaints were received against the petitioner and a preliminary enquiry was conducted into the said complaints by the Sub-Divisional Officer, District Jaipur. The said report was submitted by the Collector, Jaipur along with his recommendations to the State Government After considering the aforesaid report of preliminary enquiry, the State Government passed an order in the exercise of its powers under sub-sec. (4a) of S. 17 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on 16th July, 1984 whereby the petitioner was suspended from the office of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mangiabas, with immediate effect. A change-sheet was also served on the petitioner and the petitioner was required to submit his explanation to the same. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order of suspension passed by the State Government the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

( 2 ) A notice was issued to the State Government, non-petitioner No. 1, requiring them to show cause as to why the writ petition should not be admitted.

( 3 ) CAVEAT ha















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top