DWARKA PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed against an order passed by the learned District Judge, Pali on an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) IT is not, disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant that under the amended provisions of Section 28 of the Act, no appeal lies against an order passed on an application under Section 24 of the Act. He, however, prays that the appeal may be treated as a revision petition. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the appeal being treated as a revision petition, but he also urges that he has filed cross-objection, which may also be treated as a separate revision petition, inasmuch as the respondent has paid full court fees payable on a revision petition and has also filed a copy of the order passed by the learned District Judge, pali, along with the cross-objections and further the said cross-objections were filed within the time prescribed under the law for filing a revision petition in this Court. I, therefore, direct that the appeal filed by the appellant and the cross-objections filed by the respondents may be treated as separate