SHINGHAL, MODI
ThakarLal – Appellant
Versus
Nathu Lal – Respondent
2. The facts leading up to this appeal lie in a narrow compass. Mst. Rama respondent No. 1 obtained a money decree against Mst. Gulab. The former having died during the course of the present appeal, is now represented by Nathulal and others. The judgment-debtor Mst. Gulab also having died is represented in this appeal by respondents Nos. 5 to 7. Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 are certain other decree-holders against Mst. Gulab. Respondent No. 4 Ladulal is the alleged adopted son of Kesharlal, husband of Mst. Gulab. In execution of her decree against Mst. Gulab. Mst. Rama attached a Nohra alleging the same to belong to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.