SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Raj) 241

SHINGHAL, MODI
ThakarLal – Appellant
Versus
Nathu Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Bhandari, for Appelant; N.M. Kasliwal, for Respondent

MODI, J.—This is a special appeal by an auction purchaser against a judgment and decree of a learned single Judge of this Court dated the 25th August, 1960, and raises an interesting question of law. namely, whether an auction-purchaser is entitled to recover back the purchase money from the decree-holder after the confirmation of a sale in his favour if it is discovered in a suit brought by a third party that the judgment-debtor had no saleable interest in the property purchased by the auction-purchaser, and, therefore, he is deprived of the possession of such property.

2. The facts leading up to this appeal lie in a narrow compass. Mst. Rama respondent No. 1 obtained a money decree against Mst. Gulab. The former having died during the course of the present appeal, is now represented by Nathulal and others. The judgment-debtor Mst. Gulab also having died is represented in this appeal by respondents Nos. 5 to 7. Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 are certain other decree-holders against Mst. Gulab. Respondent No. 4 Ladulal is the alleged adopted son of Kesharlal, husband of Mst. Gulab. In execution of her decree against Mst. Gulab. Mst. Rama attached a Nohra alleging the same to belong to the



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top