SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 189

M.L.SHRIMAL, N.M.KASLIWAL
GOPAL DASS – Appellant
Versus
NATHULAL BARAYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Tikku

Judgment


KASLIWAL, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED single Judge, by order, dated Sept. 24, 1979, has referred this case to a larger Bench. The point on which the case has been referred is whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to Proceedings under Section 13-A of the Rajasthan premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). While referring the above point learned single Judge has sent the entire case for decision by the larger Bench.

( 2 ) BEFORE dealing with the legal question raised in this reference, we would mention the facts of the case. The plaintiff-petitioners filed a suit for eviction against the defendant-non-petitioner on the ground of default in the payment of rent from Nov. 12. 1963 to Oct 20, 1964. The defendant deposited rent under Section 13-A of the Act No. 12 of 1965 and as such the said suit was dismissed. According to the plaintiffs the defendant again made defaults in the payment of rent from Nov. 4, 1970 to April 3, 1973 amounting to rupees 367. 00. as such the present suit for eviction was again filed on the ground of default. On May 29, 1973 the defendant moved an application under Sections 13 (4) and (5) of the Act and





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top