SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Raj) 98

P.D.KUDAL, K.S.SIDHU
SNEHLATA MATHUR – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRA NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Tikku, M.B.L.BHARGAV, P.N.DUTT, S.N.BHARGAVA

Judgment


SIDHU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a D. B. Special Appeal by Snehlata from the order, dated November 29, 1978, made by Kasliwal J. in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 104 of 1978, affirming the order, dated, March 30, 1978, made by the District Judge, Jaipur City in guardianship Case No. 46 of 1976, allowing the application of Mahendra Narain under Section 10, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for short, the Act of 1390)and consequently appointing Mahendra Narain as guardian of his minor daughter Mona, and directing the return of Mona to his custody.

( 2 ) THE facts which are not in dispute may be shortly stated here. Mahendra narain and Snehlata, the contesting parties, were married according to Hindu rites on January 19, 1971. Their relations became strained soon after the marriage. A female child, named Mona, was born in the wedlock on January 26, 1972. The husband obtained dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on March 9, 1978. Earlier in 1972, the wife had made an application under section 552 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 for restoration of the custody of Mona to her. The husband restored the child to her in the presence of the Magistrate concerned on June 22, 1972.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top