SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Raj) 107

V.P.TYAGI
MOHANLAL – Appellant
Versus
DAYALDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.Parook, Mohanlal, P.C.Bhandari

Judgment


V. P. TYAGI, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these appeals arise out of the judgment of the learned District Judge, jaipur District, Jaipur, dated February 7, 1973, in a suit filed by the plaintiff dayaldas and Co. for the refund of Rs. 10,000/- which was paid to the defendant as an advance money for the purchase of lands Khasra Nos. 261, 266 and 268 measuring 6 Bighas and 9 Biswas.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this litigagation are, in a nut shell, as follows : mohanlal defendant entered into an agreement on June 8, 1970, to sell to the plaintiff agricultural land measuring 6 Bighas and 9 Biswas (bearing Khasra Nos. 261, 266 and 268 ). The plaintiff paid to the defendant as an advance Rs. 10,000/ -. It was agreed between the parties that by December 6, 1970, the defendant shall execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff and the possession of the plots of land agreed to be sold by the defendant shall be transferred to the plaintiff. One of the conditions of the sale was that out of these three plots of land, one Biswa of land shall be retained by the defendant. It appears that the plaintiff did not comply with the obligation cast on him under the agreement and, therefore, the sale
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top