SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Raj) 168

V.P.TYAGI
SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, JAIPUR REGION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.GUPTA, H.C.Rastogi, J.P.JAIN

Judgment


V. P. TYAGI, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ application has been filed by Surendra Kumar Sharma under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari or anv other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the non-temporary stage carriage permit granted to Chelaram respondent No. 2 by the Regional Transport authority. Jaipur by its resolution dated 4/5th and 7th August. 1967.

( 2 ) THE facts of this case are not in controversy and they are as follows: respondent No. 2 Chelaram applied for a non-temporary stage carriage permit on Beawar-Todgarh route on 29th January, 1966. That application was published in the Rajasthan Raj Patra by the Regional transport Authority on 14th April, 1966 and the Regional Transport authority granted a permit to the respondent on that route on 17th november. 1966. That order of the Regional Transport Authority was challenged in an appeal before the Transport Appellate Tribunal on the ground that the objections filed by the existing operators were not considered by the Regional Transport Authority. The Tribunal, after hearing the parties, quashed the permit granted to respondent No. 2 on 31st May, 1967. Meanwhile, t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top