Per KAN SINGH, J.—This is an appeal under sec. 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance by one Bhonrilal and is directed against the Judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 7th September, 1966, dismissing the appellants writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution whereby the appellant Bhonrilal questioned the validity of a resolution of the Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur passed in July, 1964 (Ex-9 on the record), for granting permits to respondents Nos. 2 to 21, on the Jaipur-Pilani route for running stage carriage buses. The case set up by the appellant was briefly this :

2. Bhonrilal was one of the 59 operators on the Jaipur-Sikar amalgamated route which comprised the following 8 routes :—

1. Jaipur—Sikar direct,

2. Jaipur—Chomu—Rainwal—Bhadwa,

3. Jaipur—Reengus—Sri Madhopur,

4. Jaipur—Chomu—Ajitgarh,

5. Jaipur—Chomu—Chandwari,

6. Jaipur—Pandi—Bilochi,

7. Jaipur—Chomu—Samot,

8. Jaipur—Chomu—Danta.

In 1960, the Regional Transport Authority invited applications for a direct route between Jaipur and Pilani, by a notification published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated 15th September, 1960. On 12th October, 1960, the petitioner made an application in pursuance of this no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document