SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 23

I.N.MODI, JAGAT NARAYAN, P.N.SHINGHAL
SARDAR MAL – Appellant
Versus
GAYATRI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.SHARMA, C.L.AGRAWAL, H.P.GUPTA, J.S.RASTOGI, R.K.Rastogi

Judgment


JAGAT NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure by a Division bench of this Court consisting of Modi and Shinghal, JJ. It arises out of an appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act 1951.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for disposing of it are these. Smt. Gayatri Devi respondent was elected to the House of the People at the third general elections held in the month of February 1962 from the Jaipur Parliamentary Constituency in Rajasthan. Her election was challenged by Sardar Mal appellant, who is an elector in the constituency, by an election petition on the ground of corrupt practices mentioned in para 4 thereof. Full particulars of the corrupt practices as required by Section 83 (i) (b) were given in three annexures to the petition marked A, B and C. An affidavit in support of the allegations of corrupt practices was also filed along with the petition as required under the proviso to Section 83 (2 ). The election petition, including the annexures and the accompanying affidavit, along with their copies, were presented before the Election Commission on 16-4-1962. The Commission referred the petition to an Electi

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top