SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 191

L.N.CHHANGANI
RAMDEO – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kedar Mal, N.M.VYAS, S.D.Kalla

Judgment


L. N. CHHANGANI, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference by the Sessions Judge, Merta raises for determination the following question : Whether it is open to a police officer with whom an information of the commission of an offence was lodged, to prosecute the informant under Section 182, I. P. C. (giving false information) even after the informant had filed a complaint before a Magistrate on the same facts and allegations, a complaint of Court under Section 195 (1) (b) being unnecessary. The facts and the circumstances leading to the reference are these :

( 2 ) AT about 8 or 9 P. M. on 1-6-1957 Ram Deo, the accused petitioner gave information to the S. H. D. Deedwana to the effect that Shri Kedarmal and Radha kishan committed a trespass into his house at Deedwana with preparation to cause hurt on 1-6-1957 at about 4 P. M. The case was. investigated by the Circle inspector, Deed-wana who submitted a final report to the learned Sub-Divisional magistrate to the effect that the report Was false and that Ram Deo may be ordered to be prosecuted under Section 211, I. P. C. The learned Sub-Divisional magistrate accepted the report but did not file a complaint under Section 211, I. P. C. Ram Deo


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top