SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(All) 209

Man Singh – Appellant
Versus
Reoti – Respondent


ORDER

1. These are three applications for enahancement of sentence filed on behalf of a complainant, Man Singh. The various accused persons, Reoti, Bharat Singh and Roshan Singh, have been convicted u/s 193, I.P.C. of giving false evidence against Man Singh on a charge of Section 224 I. P.C. which was brought by Reoti against Man Singh and Reoti has also been convicted u/s 211, I.P.C. The convictions were in the Court of a Magistrate on the complaint of a Sessions Judge and they were upheld in appeal by the Sessions Judge. The sentences of 6 months' rigorous imprisonment on Reoti and 4 months' rigorous imprisonment each on Bharat Singh and Rosham Singh were reduced by the Sessions Court to the period of imprisonment already undergone, which was 23 days. There was a trial of Man Singh and his son u/s 324, I. P.C. for causing the death of a woman, Mt. Rajo, and Man Singh was acquitted by the Sessions Court and Debi was acquitted by the High Court on appeal.

2. It is common ground that on 19th January 1929 the kurkamin of Sadabad went to attach property belonging to Reoti and to his brother Under a warrant of attachment issued in execution of a decree by Nek Ram. Nek Ram and Debi are so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top