SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 231

WANCHOO, DAVE
MANGILAL – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF BHILWARA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal, KANSINGH, Kistoor Mal Singhavi

Judgment


WANCHOO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Mangilal and others under Article 226 of the constitution for a writ of certiorari against the order of the Collector, Bhilwara, in a panchayat election matter.

( 2 ) THE case of the fourteen applicants is that twelve out of them were elected to the Gram Panchayat Hamirgarh on 2-10-1955. They were all members of the Jan sangh Party and the Congress Party was defeated in the elections. Consequently, opposite parties Nos. 2 to 11, who were members of the Congress Party, filed an election petition before the Collector under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Panchayat election Rules, 1954 (hereinafter called the Rules ). The enquiry into the petition was made by the Sub-Divisional Officer and thereafter the Collector set asids the election of the twelve applicants under R. 20. Consequently, the applicants have come up to this Court and their main contentions are these:

(1) That Rules 19 and 20 of the Rules providing for decision of elections are ultra vires, as not being within, the rule making power of the government. (2) That the election petition was premature inasmuch as no notification was made under Section 14 or Rule 18 (c) even till



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top