WANCHOO, DAVE
MANGILAL – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF BHILWARA – Respondent
WANCHOO, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an application by Mangilal and others under Article 226 of the constitution for a writ of certiorari against the order of the Collector, Bhilwara, in a panchayat election matter.
( 2 ) THE case of the fourteen applicants is that twelve out of them were elected to the Gram Panchayat Hamirgarh on 2-10-1955. They were all members of the Jan sangh Party and the Congress Party was defeated in the elections. Consequently, opposite parties Nos. 2 to 11, who were members of the Congress Party, filed an election petition before the Collector under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Panchayat election Rules, 1954 (hereinafter called the Rules ). The enquiry into the petition was made by the Sub-Divisional Officer and thereafter the Collector set asids the election of the twelve applicants under R. 20. Consequently, the applicants have come up to this Court and their main contentions are these:
(1) That Rules 19 and 20 of the Rules providing for decision of elections are ultra vires, as not being within, the rule making power of the government. (2) That the election petition was premature inasmuch as no notification was made under Section 14 or Rule 18 (c) even till
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.