SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 256

BHANDARI
GAYA PARSHAD – Appellant
Versus
BASDEO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.AGARWAL, R.A.GUPTA

Judgment


BHANDARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a civil second appeal by Gaya Parshad one of the defendants in suit No. 38 of 1951, filed for the recovery of rent by Basdeo and two others against him and Baijnath respondent in the court of the Civil Judge, Sikar, on the 2-3-1951. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had taken one shop situated in the town of Fatehpur on rent from them on a monthly rent of Rs. 50/-, under the rent note dated the 12-6-1948, and that, on the non-payment of the rent by the defendants, the plaintiffs obtained a decree on the 18-12-1948. against them for the recovery of rent due upto 19-10-1948. The plaintiffs further alleged that a sum of Rs. 1415/- had become due as arrears of rent from the defendants from 20-10-1948, upto 28-2-1951, but the defendants did not pay the rent in spite of notice to them. The plaintiffs further added a sum of Rs. 1s5/-as interest at 1% P. M. to this amount and claimed the sum of Rs. 1600/ -. Both the defendants filed separate written statements but the pleas raised by them are substantially the same. The defendants denied the execution of the rent note and further urged that they were the tenants of the shop from 6mt. 2000 and th




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top