SWATANTER KUMAR, B.S.CHAUHAN
May George – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that Notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 7.1.1976 covering the area to the extent of 30.80 acres being part of different survey numbers and belonging to large number of persons in Seevaram Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chingleput District of Tamil Nadu for planned development of Electrical/Electronics Industrial Estate including appellant’s land measuring 33 cents therein in Survey No. 36/1A/1. Considering grave urgency, filing of objections under Section 5A of the Act were dispensed with and provisions of Section 17 of the Act were resorted to. Declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made o
State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Babu Ram Upadhya (AIR 1961 SC 751) 16
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd., Rampur vs. Municipal Board
State of Mysore vs. V.K. Kangan (AIR 1975 SC 2190) 17
Sharif-Ud-Din vs. Abdul Gani Lone (AIR 1980 SC 303) 18
Balwant Singh & Ors. vs. Anand Kumar Sharma & Ors. ((2003) 3 SCC 433) 19
Bhavnagar University vs. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (AIR 2003 SC 511) 19
Chandrika Prasad Yadav vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (AIR 2004 SC 2036) 19
M/s. Rubber House vs. M/s. Excellsior Needle Industries Pvt. Ltd. (AIR 1989 SC 1160) 20
B.S. Khurana & Ors. vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. ((2000) 7 SCC 679) 21
State of Haryana & Anr. vs. Raghubir Dayal ((1995) 1 SCC 133) 22
Dr. G.H. Grant vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1966 SC 237) 26
State of Tamil Nadu vs. Mahalakshmi Ammal & Ors. ((1996) 7 SCC 269) 28
Nasik Municipal Corporation vs. Harbanslal Laikwant Rajpal & Ors. ((1997) 4 SCC 199) 28
Tika Ram & Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Ors. ((2009) 10 SCC 689) 30
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.