MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Gopal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, factual matrix of case is that one Manmohan lodged a report at Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur on 24.08.1994 in connection with alleged occurrence which took place between years 1981 and 1983. As per case of complainant, there was land of Khasra No.251/281 measuring 37 bighas and 14 biswas in village Devari situated at Gopalpura Road. On 30.04.1981 an agreement to sale was executed between petitioner, in capacity of Secretary, National Housing Cooperative Society Limited, Jaipur, and complainants Manmohan, Motilal, Praveen and Rikhab Chand Pungaliya. It was agreed that the amount of Rs.15,000/- per bigha will be paid and thus total amount of Rs.5,65,500/- will be paid as sale consideration. It was also mentioned that Manmohan, Motilal and Praveen were having half share and Rikhab Chand Pungaliya was having a
State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) 4
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. (AIR 2008 SC 251) 7
Dalip Kumar vs. Jagnar Singh ((2009) 14 SCC 696 = 2009(4) RLW 3488 (SC)) 13
Mohammad Ibrahim & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Anr. ((2009) 8 SCC 751) 14
V.Y. Jose & Anr. vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. ((2009) 3 SCC 78) 15
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.