SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 1284

AMARESH KUMAR SINGH
Rajasthan State Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sukiya – Respondent


For the Appellants:Mr. L.M. Lodha, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Suresh Kumbhat and Mr. B.K. Bhatnagar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.7.1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bali in Civil Suit No. 53 of 1992 decreeing the plaintiffs' suit for Rs. 1,15,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of institution of suit till the date of realisation.

3. The facts leading to this appeal are summarised as under :

The plaintiff-respondents filed the civil suit No. 53 of 1992 in the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Bali. According to the averments made in the plaint, the plaintiffs were dependent upon deceased Jor Bharti, who used to cultivate the fields of Vardha Bharti. The defendants had installed electric pole in the agricultural field belonging to Vardha Bharti. The electric lines were running over the field. In the first week of August, 1992, an electric wire was broken and it fell on the ground. An information was given to the Lineman Megha Ram and he went on the spot. He told that the broken wire was 'earth wire' and the same did not pose any danger. No action was taken by the defendants for repairing the broken wire. On 10.8.1992 at about 5.30 p.m











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top