1. - These special appeals have been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.2.1992. Both the above appeals are disposed of by this common judgment since the points involved are common.

2. The dispute relates with regard to the admission of the petitioners in M.D. Anasthesia (P.G. Course), which was not granted to them initially.

3. The submission of Mr. Mridul appearing on behalf of Dr. Mahendra Vangani and Dr. Sushil Pokharna is that the learned Single Judge has erred in relying the provisions of the Ordinance issued on 7.10.1989, whereas it was admitted that the provisions of Old Ordinance issued in April, 1989 are applicable to the petitioner. It has further been submitted that if there is no reshuffling or filling up of the vacancies within a period stipulated in the Ordinance, the vacancies should not be allowed to lapse and that since there was no reshuffling within, a period of 3 weeks, hence no second reshuffling is possible. It has also been submitted that the candidates who have not approached the court have no to claim any benefit and since provisional admission was granted to the petitioners they have studied and have appeared in the examina