SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Raj) 340

S.K.M.LODHA
Radha Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Naraindas – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. P.C. Mathur, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. M.C. Bhoot, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant (landlord) against the appellant order dated November 15, 1982 of the Additional Civil Judge, Jodpur passed in Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1982, by which he accepted the appeal and remanded the case to the trial Court after framing an additional for fresh decision.

2. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit against the respondent (tenant) in respect of a shop on March 13, 1978 for arrears of rent and ejectment. The ejectment was sought on the grounds of default and reasonable and bone fide necessity. The suit was contested by the defendants on various grounds by filing a written statement on September 4, 1978. While denying the allegations made by the plaintiff in the plaint other pleas were also raised. The learned Munsif framed as many as 11 issues inclusive of the relief. The plaintiff examined P.W. 1 Radha Kishan, P.W. 2. Sunil Behari, P.W. 3. Jethmal. P.W. 4. Som Dutt and P.W. 5. Kedardass. In rebuttal, the defendant examined himself as D.W. 1, D.W. 2. Daulat Singh, D.W. 3. Jethanand, and D.W. 4 Kanhaiyalal. Documentary evidence of the parties were also exhibited and proved. The Learned Munsif, by his judgment dated Au





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top