SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Raj) 439

S.K.M.LODHA
Bhawani Singh – Appellant
Versus
Achal Singh – Respondent


For the Appellant:Mr. L.R. Mehta and Mr. R.M. Bhansali, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. G.R. Singhvi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This is a defendant's second appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. directed against the judgment and decree dated March 31, 1981 of the Civil Judge, Jodhpur, by which, he maintained the judgment and decree dated September 8, 1979 of the Munsif City, Jodhpur.

2. It is not necessary to state the facts in detail. Suffice it to mention that the plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for ejectment in respect of the premises described in para 1 of the plaint, inter alia, on the ground of reasonable and bonafide necessity. It was contested by the defendant-appellant. The learned Munsif framed necessary issues arising out of the pleadings of the parties. The evidence was recorded. By his judgment and decree dated September 8, 1979, the learned Munsif decided issues No. 4 and 7 relating to reasonable and bonafide necessity and comparative hardship in favour if the plaintiff and against the defendant and decree the suit for ejectment. The defendant preferred an appeal and the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur, by his judgment dated March 31, 1981 confirmed the findings of issue Nos. 4 and 7 and maintained the decree for ejectment. Hence this second appeal by the tenant-defendant as aforesa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top