2013 Supreme(Raj) 1309
R.S.CHAUHAN
Nanak Chand Sejwani – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
For the Petitioner:M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Advocate, A.K. Srivastava, P.K. Soni and Sanjay Verma, Advocates.
For the State: Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor.
For the Respondent No. 2:S.S. Hora and Vijay Gupta, Advocates.
JUDGMENT
1. - The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the FIR No. 108/2012, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 22.5.1998, the petitioner's son, Anil Kumar, was married to respondent No. 2, Smt. Manju Sejwani, in accordance with the Hindu rites and customs. Prior to her marriage, Smt. Manju was a permanent resident of Spain where she lived with her brothers and parents. While in Spain, she worked and earned for herself. After her marriage while she stayed at Jaipur, she was uncomfortable and insisted that she be permitted to go back to Spain. She stayed with her in-laws in Jaipur for five to six months. In November, 1998, she went back to Spain. In February, 1999, she bore a son. In August, 1999, the petitioner's son, Anil Kumar, also migrated to Spain. From August, 1999 till October, 2009 i.e. almost for a decade, Anil and Manju stayed together in Spain. However, after 2002, Manju's marriage became rocky to the extent that Manju and her husband had a temporary split in 2002. Without informing her, Anil left Spain alongwith their son an
Click Here to Read the rest of this document