1. - In these writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the factual and legal points involved are identical, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Writ Petition No. 43/1996 has been filed on behalf of petitioner Ravi Dutt whereas Petition No. 44/1996 has been filed on behalf of purchaser of Parmanand and Petition No. 46/ 1996 is also filed on behalf of purchaser of Mangelal.

3. The applications were filed under sub-section (2-A) of Section 15-AAA of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") before the Tehsildar. Ghadsana on 3- 5-1993 who after procuring a report from the halka patwari conferred upon them khatedari rights by his order dated 28-5-1993. Aggrieved against that order State of Rajasthan, through Naib Tehsildar, Ghadsana, filed appeals before the Collector, Sriganganagar who vide order dated 24-7-1995 has set aside the order of Tehsildar. A revision petition filed in the Board of Revenue, Ajmer vide Anx. 7 dated 5-9-1995 was also dismissed. Hence these petitions.

4. In order to get benefit of sub-section (2-A) of Section 15-AAA of the Act the applicant was to prima facie show that he was