SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 903

N.L.TIBREWAL
Dilip Kulkarni – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar of Companies, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Paras Kuhad, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Suresh Pareek, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - In this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed to quash the complaint and the orders dated, November 28, 1991 and January 18,1992 passed by Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences) Rajasthan, Jaipur in Criminal Complaint Case No. 492/89.

2. In order to appreciate the contentions urged by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, it will be proper to set out necessary facts of the case before dealing with them.The Registrar of Companies, Jaipur has filed a complaint against the petitioners, the Company M/s. Kopyrite Ltd. and Shri M.R. Pathankar. At the outset it may be stated that the proceedings are in the initial stages as all the accused have not yet appeared in Trial Court after service. The petitioners, too, are not appearing and bailable warrants have been issued several times to secure their attendance in Court. Atone point of time the petitioners had appeared in Court through their Counsel, but on 29.11.91 their Counsel also did not appear and bailable warrants have been issued.

3. The complaint has been filed under Section 220(3) of the Companies Act. The petitioners and the co-accused M.R. Pathankar were









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top