SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 278

S.C.AGRAWAL
Dr. R. K Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Dr. R K Sharma, has prayed for a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 12th June, 1973 passed by the State Government, whereby the penalty of compulsory retirement with proportionate pension has been imposed on the petitioner.

2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are as follows.

3. The petitioner was an employee of the State Government and in the year 1961-62 he was posted as Medical Jurist at Prince Vijai Singh Memorial Men's Hospital, Bikaner. When he was working as Medical Jurist at the said hospital, the petitioner conducted the postmortem examination on the dead body of one Smt. Daya Devi (Dayawati) on 17th April, 1962, and prepared a report after conducting the said post-mortem examination. While acting as medical Jurist at the said hospital the petitioner on 13th September, 1961, had examined the injuries of one Hanumandas Chandak and had prepared the injury report on the basis of the aforesaid medical examination of Shri Chandak. By memorandum dated 29th February, 1968, the petitioner was informed that it was p


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top