SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 764

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
S.C.Agrawal, J.
Jogendra Singh & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S. B. C W. P. No. 731, 732, 733, 952, 1245 & 776 of 1986 respectively.
Decided On : 23-10-1986

Prescribing minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination in the selection process for public employment is arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Headnote:

RAJASTHAN FOREST SERVICE - RAJASTHAN FOREST SUBORDINATE SERVICE - RULES - SELECTION - MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS - INTERVIEW - CONSTITUTIONALITY - ARBITRARINESS - VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION - HELD, PRESCRIBING MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS FOR INTERVIEW IS ARBITRARY AND UNREASONABLE AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who appeared in a combined competitive examination conducted by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) for direct recruitment to the posts of Assistant Conservator of Forest (ACF) in the Rajasthan Forest Service and Ranger Grade I in the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and the proviso to sub-rule (g) of Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, which prescribed minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination and minimum aggregate marks, respectively. They contended that these provisions were arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that prescribing minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination was arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court observed that the interview test is subjective and based on first impressions and is capable of abuse, and that allocating more than 15% of the total marks for the interview would be arbitrary and liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid. The court also held that the provision prescribing minimum aggregate marks was not arbitrary or unreasonable and did not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Issues: 1. Whether the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and the proviso to sub-rule (g) of Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, which prescribed minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination and minimum aggregate marks, respectively, were arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that prescribing minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination was arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court observed that the interview test is subjective and based on first impressions and is capable of abuse, and that allocating more than 15% of the total marks for the interview would be arbitrary and liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners who challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and directed the RPSC to prepare a merit list of candidates who were called for the personality and viva voce examination but did not obtain the minimum qualifying marks, ignoring the concept of minimum qualifying marks. The court also directed the state government to consider the petitioners for appointment to the post of ACF prospectively, based on the merit list.

JUDGMENT

1. - All these writ petitions relate to selections made by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission') for appointment, by way of direct recruitment, on the post of Assistant Conservator of Forest and Ranger Grade I. The post of Assistant Conservator of Forest (for short 'ACF", is a post included in the Rajasthan Forest Service and recruitment to the pots in the Rajasthan Forest Service and conditions of service of the persons appointed to the said post is regulated by the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules, 1962 (herein after referred to as the State Service Rules'). Under the State Service Rules, direct recruitment to the post in the Service is to be made by a competetivc examination conducted by the Commission. The said examination consists of written test to be followed by personality and viva voce examination. The written to test consists of 5 papers of 100 marks each, i.e. 500 marks in all. Three papers are for compulsory subjects and two papers are for optional subjects. Under Rule 24 of the State Service Rules, it is provided that the Commission shall call for interview such of the candidates who have obtained a minimum 35% marks in each of the compulsory subjects and a minimum of 40% marks in the aggregate in written test. It has also been provided in the said rule that the Commission may, in its discretion, award grace marks upto I in each of the compulsory papers and upto 3 in the aggregate. Earlier, the marks prescribed for the interview were 100. but by amendment introduced by notification dated 4th March, 1986 the said marks have been reduced to 60. Rule 24 also prescribes that the marks awarded in the interview shall be added to the marks obtained in the written test of each candidate. Sub-rule (1) of rule 25 of State Service Rule, lays down that the Commission shall prepare a list of the candidates recommended by them for direct recruitment to the Rajasthan Forest Service in the order of their proficiency as disclosed by the aggregate marks. In the proviso to the said sub rule. it has, however, been laid down that the Commission shall not recommend any candidate who has failed to obtain a minmmun of 33% marks, in the personality and viva voce examination and a minimum of 45% stark, in the aggregate. With regard to candidates belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, it has, however, been provided in sub-rule (2) of Rule 25 that the commission may recommend the name of such candidates upto the number of vacancies reserved for then from amongst those who have qualified for interview even if they fail to obtain the minimum marks in the personality and viva voce examination or in the aggregate prescribed under proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25.

2. The post of Ranger Grad, I is included in the Rajasthan Subordinate Forest Service and recruitment to posts in and conditions of service of persons appointed to the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service is regulated by the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Subordinate Service Rules'). The Subordinate Service Rules also make provision for direct recruitment to the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service through a competetive examination held by the Commission. The said competelive examination also consists of a written test and personality and viva voce examination. The written test consists of five subjects out of which three are compulsory subjects and two are optional subjects carrying 100 marks each i.e. in all 500 marks. The personality and viva voce examination earlier carried 100 marks, but after amendment, vide notification dated 4th March, 1986, the marks for personalty and viva voce examination have been reduced to 60. In clause (f) of Rule 20 of the Subordinate Service Rules, it is provided that candidates who have obtained a minimum 35% narks in each of the compulsory subjects and minimum of 40 marks in the aggregate in written test shall be considered to have obt















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top