RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
S.C.Agrawal, J.
Jogendra Singh & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S. B. C W. P. No. 731, 732, 733, 952, 1245 & 776 of 1986 respectively.
Decided On : 23-10-1986
RAJASTHAN FOREST SERVICE - RAJASTHAN FOREST SUBORDINATE SERVICE - RULES - SELECTION - MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS - INTERVIEW - CONSTITUTIONALITY - ARBITRARINESS - VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION - HELD, PRESCRIBING MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS FOR INTERVIEW IS ARBITRARY AND UNREASONABLE AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14 AND 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who appeared in a combined competitive examination conducted by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) for direct recruitment to the posts of Assistant Conservator of Forest (ACF) in the Rajasthan Forest Service and Ranger Grade I in the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and the proviso to sub-rule (g) of Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, which prescribed minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination and minimum aggregate marks, respectively. They contended that these provisions were arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that prescribing minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination was arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court observed that the interview test is subjective and based on first impressions and is capable of abuse, and that allocating more than 15% of the total marks for the interview would be arbitrary and liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid. The court also held that the provision prescribing minimum aggregate marks was not arbitrary or unreasonable and did not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Issues: 1. Whether the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and the proviso to sub-rule (g) of Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, which prescribed minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination and minimum aggregate marks, respectively, were arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that prescribing minimum qualifying marks for the personality and viva voce examination was arbitrary and unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The court observed that the interview test is subjective and based on first impressions and is capable of abuse, and that allocating more than 15% of the total marks for the interview would be arbitrary and liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners who challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to sub-rule (1) of Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Forest Service Rules and directed the RPSC to prepare a merit list of candidates who were called for the personality and viva voce examination but did not obtain the minimum qualifying marks, ignoring the concept of minimum qualifying marks. The court also directed the state government to consider the petitioners for appointment to the post of ACF prospectively, based on the merit list.
Javid Rasool Bhat and others v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others: (1984)2 S.C.C. 631
Miss Nishi Maghu etc. v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others = AIR 1980 SC 1975
P. K. Ramchandra Iyer and others v. Union of India and others = AIR 1984 SC 541
R. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore and others = AIR 1964 SC 1823
State of Karnataka and another v. M. Farida and others = AIR 1976 SC 2482
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.