1. - The petitioner Loombaram, by his application dated Feb. 13, 1979 has submitted that tinder the provisions of Section 112 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') Ramjiwan, who had also applied to be substituted as a petitioner in the above mentioned election-petition in place of the deceased petitioner Umed Ram, should also be substituted as a petitioner on such terms and conditions as to security or otherwise as this Court may deem proper. The allegation of the petitioner Loombaram is that Ramjiwan "appears to be in hand and glove with the respondent Shri, Ramnarain" and although he was not interested in being substituted as a petitioner in place of late Shri Omedram, yet he filed an application for substitution merely in order to delay the proceedings in this election petition. The aforesaid allegation may to may riot be correct, yet the question Which requires consideration is, as to whether all the persons, who apply for being substituted, as petitioners under Sub-section (3) of Section 112 of the Act, should necessarily be brought on the record, of course, subject to the Imposition of conditions regarding payment of se