SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 248

K.S.LODHA
Jalam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Narain Kanwar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - These two appeals arise out of the judgment and decree of the referred Addl District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur dated 8-4-72 by which the plaintiff Jalam Singh's suit was partly decreed. He claimed ⅓ share in the properties shown in Schedules A, B, C and D filed along with the plaint. He has been granted only ⅙ share in one Haveli situated at Jodhpur. The rest of his suit has been dismissed. Jalam Singh, therefore, claims a decree for ⅓ share in all the properties whereas Smt. Narain Kanwar and others in their appeal urged that the plaintiff is not entitled even to ⅙ share in the Haveli

2. The facts giving rise to these appeals briefly stated are that Shri Sajjan Singh was a Jagirdar of Sanderao, which was a scheduled jagir under the Matwar Land Revenue Act, Shri Sajjan Singh died on 17-7-1952 leaving behind three sons Bhim Singh, Takhat Siogh and Jalam Singh. Bhim Singh was the eldest and according to the rule of prime geniture applicable to the scheduled jagirs his succession was sanctioned by the Rajpramukh, Bhim Singh also died on 20-5-61 leaving behind him his widow Smt. Narain Kanwar and two daughters Kumari Rajendra Kanwar and Pushpendra Kanwar. The plaintiff Jalam Si




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top