1. - This revision petition by the defendants is directed against an order of the Additional District judge, Udaipur, dated January 17, 1975. The facts giving rise to this revision petition ma) briefly be-stated as follows.

2. The plaintiff-non-petitioner filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of Rs. 22.566/07 on the basis of pro-note dated October 30, 1969. The defendants resisted the suit on various grounds. On the pleadings of the parties, the court framed as many as 9 issues on July 25, 1974 and adjourned the case to September 13, 1974 for examination of the plaintiffs' witnesses. The parties were also directed to file list of witnesses within 15 days. The plaintiff filed list of witnesses within the time but the defendants failed to do so. They filed the list of witnesses on November 7, 1974, i.e. before the plaintiff closed his evidence. The learned Additional District Judge refused to examine the witnesses mentioned in the list of witnesses filed by the defendants on the ground that the list of witnesses was filed beyond the prescribed time. It was prayed to the learned Additional District judge that the list of witnesses filed on November 7. 1974 may b