1. - This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal by the learned Sessions Judge, Shri Ganganagar dated 28.5.1970. Accused Het Ram and Parman were challenged under Sections 302/34 and 307, and Section 302, IPC and Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act. The learned Sessions Judge acquitted all the accused of the charges framed against them. Feeling aggrieved by the judgement of the learned Session Judge, Shri Ganganagar, the State has come up in appeal.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that Bheemsen sent a written FIR to the Police Station, Tibi through one Atma Ram. Haru Ram, however, met Atma Ram on his way to the Police Station, Tibi, and Atma Ram gave this written report to Haru Ram for presenting it to the Police Station, Tibi, Haru Ram, accordingly, presented this report and added that after the departure of Bheemsen from village Peerkamariya, Brij Lal had died.

3. The salient features of the First Information Report are that Haru Ram and Khayali Chamars were "siris" (partners) of Bheemsen. In the evening of 17.3.1969, the accused Het Ram, Parman and Raja Ram along with two other persons and Jagdish fired towards the house of Haru and Khayali Chamars.