1992 Supreme(Raj) 891
G.S.SINGHVI
Lecturers’ Forum : Jag Mohan Mathodia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Rajendra prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondents:C.K. Garg, Addl. Advocate General and Ashok Parihar, Addl. Govt. Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Both these writ petitions involve similar questions of law. Even the facts are by and large similar. For this reason, these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.
2. In order to decide the controversy between the parties it is proper to set out some facts. The first writ petition was initially filed before the Supreme Court of India. By an order of the Supreme Court dated June 6, 1989 it was directed that the writ petition be treated to be one filed under Article 226 of the Constitution and be transferred to Rajasthan High Court. Thereafter this Court issued a notice to the respondents calling upon them to show cause as to why the writ petition be not admitted and disposed of. This writ petition has been filed on behalf of 21 temporary lecturers working in the Rajasthan School of Arts and Rajasthan Sangcct Sansthan. These lecturers have formed an association with the name of Lecturers' Forum and through this Forum they have presented the petition. In substance the grievance of these temporary lecturers is that the policy of the Government in making their appointments on temporary basis against the permanent and regular posts available in the colleges v
Click Here to Read the rest of this document