2011 Supreme(Raj) 2342
VINEET KOTHARI
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sajjan Raj – Respondent
For the Appellant-Defendant:Sajjan Singh and J.K. Bhaiya, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Jitendra Chopra and Yashwant Mehta, Advocates.
JUDGMENT
1. - This first appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. has been filed by the Appellant Sushil Kumar S/o Sohan Lal against the judgment and decree of possession of learned Court of Additional District judge (Fast Track) No. 3, jodhpur dated 15.12.2007 in Civil Suit No. 345/2004 (32/1996), {Madan Singh Bhati through purchaser Sajjan Raj v. Sushil Kumar and Ors. }.
2. Brief facts of the case giving rise to this first appeal are as under:
3. The plaintiff-Madan Singh Bhati filed a suit for permanent injunction before the learned Additional Munsif Magistrate No. 1, jodhpur in respect of Plot No. 44-A situated at Shantipriya Nagar, Near Chirghar, jodhpur (measuring 50' x 90'), which was said to have been purchased by one Balbeer Kumar through registered sale deed dated 24.3.1983. A strip of land adjacent to the said plot was also purchased by said Balbeer Kumar by a registered sale deed dated 19.9.1986. The said Balbeer Kumar executed an agreement to sell for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- in respect of said plot No. 44-A in favour of defendant- Sushil Kumar, which was registered on 14.1.1988. While the said agreement to sell dated 14.1.1988 was subsisting, however, no conveyance deed or sale
Click Here to Read the rest of this document