SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 914

Alka Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Narender Kumar Gupta – Respondent


ORDER

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.

1. Leave granted Heard For convenience the appellant and respondent will also be referred to by their ranks in the suit, as `plaintiff' and `defendant' respectively.

2. The appellant and respondent entered into a partnership as per deed dated 5.4.2000 to run an Institute for preparing students for competitive examinations, under the name and style of `Takshila Institute', at No.F-19, LSC, Bhera Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.

3. On 29.6.2004, the appellant entered into an "agreement to sell" (Bayana Agreement) under which she agreed to sell the property described as follows:

"An undivided half share, second floor (without roof rights) of built up property bearing No.8, Pocket & Block C9, Sector-8, Rohini, Delhi - 110 085, built on a plot of land area measuring 158.98 Sq.m and 50% share of M/s Takshila Institute established in the above said property which is hereby agreed to be sold includes all rights, titles, interests, goodwill, electricity equipment, furniture, fixtures including passages, easements facilities privileges etc., which attached thereto or connected therewith."

Clause 13 of the said agreement clarified that the property agreed to be sold
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top