SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1712

GOVIND MATHUR
Vandana Devi Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Harish Purohit, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Yashpal Khileree, Dy. Government Counsel.

JUDGMENT

1. - Shri Chandra Mohan Vyas husband of petitioner No.1 was in employment of the respondents as Compounder and was subjected to disciplinary proceedings under a memorandum dated 5.3.1987 issued by the disciplinary authority while exercising powers under Rule 16 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958. The memorandum was supported by a charge-sheet and a statement of allegations relating to 13 misconducts. An explanation was submitted by the delinquent employee and after considering the same, under an order dated 24.2.1992, an Enquiry Officer was appointed to enquire into the allegations levelled.

2. The delinquent employee submitted several representations to the disciplinary authority as well as to enquiry officer with the assertion that he was facing criminal charges too for the same allegations as under adjudication in disciplinary action, therefore, the disciplinary proceedings be kept in2 abeyance till completion of the criminal case. The demand made by the delinquent was not accepted and the Enquiry Officer after going through certain official record, submitted his report to the disciplinary authority on 15.12.1999. After a lapse of


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top