2012 Supreme(Raj) 2267
ARUN MISHRA, NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN I
Justice I. S. Israni (Retd. ) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
For the Petitioner in petition no. 2774/12.:Mr. Prateek Kasliwal and Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Advocates and Mr. Rajendra Soni, Amicus Curiae.
For the Petitioner in petition no. 8697/12:Mr. Vinayak Joshi, Advocate.
For the for intervenors in petition no. 2774/12: Mr.Arvind Kumar Arora, Mr.Sandeep Taneja, Mr.Kapil Gupta, Mr.Amod Kasliwal, Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma, Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Mr. Ajay Tyagi and Mr. B.L. Sharma, Senior Counsel.
For the Respondent TAIPA in petition no. 2774/12.:Mr. Lokesh Atrey and Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocates.
For the Cellulor Operators Association of India in (Petitioner petition no. 17867/12 and respondent no. 21 in petition no. 2774/12):Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Naveen Chawla, Mr. Devansh Mohta, Mr. Ravi Chirania, Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, Advocates.
For the Petitioner in petition no. 18304/12:Mr. Sudhir Gupta, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Anuroop Singhi and Mr. Ankit Shah, Advocates.
For the Respondent no. 15 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. Kamlakar Sharma, Senior Counsel, with Ms.Alankrita Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 10 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. Virendra Lodha, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondents no. 11, 13, 18 and 19 in petition no. 2774/12 and respondent no. 7 in petition no. 8697/12):Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Senior Counsel, Mr. Nisheeth Dixit, Advocate.
For the Union of India.: Mr. S.S. Raghav, Additional Solicitor General.
For the State of Rajasthan.:Mr. Dinesh Yadav, AAG with Mr.Subhash Kuntal, Mr. Amit ojha, Mr. Vikram Yadav and Mr. Ram Gopal Khhinchi, Advocates.
For the Respondent no. 8 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. Sanjay Srivastava, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 9 & 12 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. Akhil Simlot, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 6 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. R.A. Katta, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 17 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 16 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. Indresh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent no. 4 in petition no. 2774/12.:Mr. Saurabh Saraswat, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 20 in petition no. 2774/12:Mr. T.P. Sharma, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these writ petitions, they were heard together and are being decided by common order.D.B.PIL Petition No. 2774/2012, Justice I.S. Israni (Retd.) & anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
2. The said writ petition has been filed in the public interest by the petitioners-Justice I.S. Israni (Retd.) and Smt. Nirmala Singh praying for the relief that the Central Government as well as the State Government and their instrumentalities be directed to formulate regulatory body in relation to emission of radio frequency and electro magnetic radiations emitted by or likely to be emitted by mobile towers and for monitoring emission from these towers; prayer has also been made to stop the respondents from increasing capacity and further, no license to operate towers in the residential areas should be granted to the respondents-companies at the risk of health and life of people; prayer has also been made to direct the respondents to remove the towers from the hospitals, schools and residential areas so as to minimise the environmental and noise pollution.D.B. PIL Petition No. 8697/2012, Pearl Green Acres Owners Welfare & Maintenanc
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
