2006 Supreme(Raj) 2958
HARBANS LAL
Jagdish Rai Tandon – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
For the Petitioners in S.B. Cr. Rev. Pet No. 1152/03, 1067/03:Mahendra Goyal and J.P. Goyal, Advocates.
For the Respondent No.2 in S.B. Cr. Rev. Pet. No. 1152/03:Biri Singh, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. Arun Sharma, PP.
JUDGMENT
1. - Since both these Cr. Revision Petitions under Section 397 r/w. Section 401 Cr.PC. have been filed against the common order dated 23.7.2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate No. 9, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Cr. Case No. 428/2002 whereby, charges for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 420 and 120B IPC have been framed against accused Jitendra, J.R. Tandon, Smt. Kailash Rani and Angrish Tandon, charges for offences under Sections 498A, 420 and 120B IPC have been framed against Smt. Kiran Tandon and Smt. Savita Malhotra and for offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC against SunH Malhotra, Nalini Tandon and G.K. Tandon,_ they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners have filed these revision petitions for quashing of the aforesaid charges framed against them.
2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts are that Mst. Charu D/o K.L. Arora was married to Jitendra on 6.12.2000 as per Hindu rites in Jaipur. It is alleged that soon after the marriage it was discovered that Jitendra Tandon was suffering from Schizophrenia and G6P.D. Deficiency diseases for a long time and he had also not qualified t
Click Here to Read the rest of this document