1994 Supreme(Raj) 727
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
G.S.Singhvi, J.
Jaipur Bottling Company - Appellant
Versus
State & Another. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3742 of 1991.
Decided On : 19-04-1994
The word 'use' in Section 104(1)(2) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act must be given a meaning in consonance with Entry 52 of II List of VII Schedule of the Constitution.
Headnote:
OCTROI - LEVY ON EMPTY BOTTLES - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 104(1)(2) OF RAJASTHAN MUNICIPALITIES ACT - MEANING OF 'USE' - REFUND OF OCTROI - CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 104(1)(2) - ENTRY 52 OF II LIST OF VII SCHEDULE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a manufacturer of aerated water, challenged the levy of octroi by the Municipality on empty bottles returned to the petitioner for refilling. The petitioner argued that no element of consumption, use, or sale was involved in the receipt of bottles. The Municipality contended that the use of empty bottles for refilling fell within the scope of Section 104 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that once the bottles had already been subjected to levy of octroi, they could not be subjected to a charge of octroi once again merely because the empty bottles were returned to the manufacturer for the purpose of refilling. The Court interpreted the word 'use' in Section 104(1)(2) in consonance with Entry 52 of II List of VII Schedule of the Constitution. The Court further held that the Municipal Council had acted illegally in charging octroi from the petitioner on the bottles on which octroi had been paid earlier.
Issues: 1. Whether the Municipality had jurisdiction to levy and collect octroi on the empty bottles received by the petitioner at Jaipur? 2. Whether the use of empty bottles for the purpose of refilling fell within the scope of Section 104 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Municipality did not have jurisdiction to levy and collect octroi on the empty bottles received by the petitioner at Jaipur. 2. The Court interpreted the word 'use' in Section 104(1)(2) in consonance with Entry 52 of II List of VII Schedule of the Constitution. The Court held that any other meaning to the word 'use' would render the Section itself unconstitutional.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and directed the Municipal Council (now Corporation) not to levy and collect octroi on the empty bottles which were used by the petitioner for the purpose of refilling of soft drinks. The Court also directed the respondents to take action in accordance with the stay order dated 9.7.1991 regarding the refund of octroi realized by the Municipality.
"52. Taxes on the entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein.
1959 Act prior to amendment104 Obligatory taxes
(1) Every board shall levy, at such rate and from such date as the State Government may in each case direct by notification in the official Gazette and in such manner as is laid down in this Act and as may be provided in the rules made by the State Government in this behalf, the following taxes, namely :
(1) a tax on the annual letting value of buildings or lands or both, situated within the municipality;
(2) an octroi on goods and animals brought within the limits of the municipality for consumption, use or sale therein;
After amendment104 Obligatory taxes
(1) Every board shall levy, at such rate and from such date as the State Government may in each case direct by notification in the official Gazette and in such mann