SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1270

M.A.A.KHAN
Shyam Sunder – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - In this case the petitioner was found offering for sale and did actually sell to Hari Prakash, Food Inspector adulterated 'Desi Ghee' on 15.5.79 at his business premises, M/s. Shyam Sunder Narendra Kumar at Mandi Madar Gate, Ajmer. The Food Inspector filed the complaint on 20.8.79 in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,. Ajmer who read over and explained the substance of the accusation to the petitioner on 7.9.82 and before recording any evidence in the case made over the case on 22.11.1983 to Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Ajmer for trial and disposal according to law. The learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, No. 2. Ajmer completed the trial of the petition and vide his judgment and order dated 8.2.89 found him guilty of the offence under section. 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), convicted him therefor and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for six months and pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- for his guilt. The petitioner appealed to the Sessions Judge, Ajmer.

2. A number of objections appear to have been taken by the petitioner before the learned Sessions Judge against the judgment and order as made by the l










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top