SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1337

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Manju Saini – Appellant
Versus
Parbhati – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Short and interesting question arises in this revision petition as to what is the scope of Rule 89 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj. (Election) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1994) in connection with the transfer of election petition filed before the District Judge.

2. The petitioner Smt. Manju Saini, is a duly elected Sarpanch of village Panchayat Nayan, Panchayat Samiti Shahpura, District Jaipur constituted under the provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Adhiniyam, 1994 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act of 1994).

3. The non-petitioner Smt. Prabhati was a contesting candidate in the said election and after declaration of result the petitioner elected as Sarpanch by the, Returning Officer concerned. The non-petitioner instituted a civil suit under Rule 80 of the Rules of 1994 in the Court of District Judge, Jaipur District. This civil suit came to be registered in the said court as Civil Suit No. 31 of 1995 and the petitioner was summoned to appear before the said court on 15.4.1995. The petitioner submitted an application under Order 6 Rule 16 read with Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and 151 CPC and under Rule 80, 81, 82 and 83 of the Rules of 1994 b








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top