SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.M. SAHAI AND S.B. MAJMUDAR, JJ.
Regional Executive, Kerala Fishermens Welfare Fund Board, Appellant
Versus
M/s. Fancy Food and another etc. Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 3058 of 1995 WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 3059-71, 3093 of 1995 AND C.A. Nos. 5214, 5245 and 3937 etc. etc. of 1995 (with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 2849, 2927, 3314, 2344, 3777, 2778, 3775 and 3779 etc. etc. of 1995)
Decided on 25-4-1995.
Kerala Fishermens Welfare Fund Act, 1985 - Section 3 - Fisheries Department - Payment of financial assistance - State in it was found that per capita income of fishermen was not even half of normal per capita income of ordinary person in State - Therefore the enacted Kerala Fishermen’s Welfare Fund Act for short which was assented to by President of India - Act provides for constitution of welfare fund for promotion of welfare of fishermen in State of Kerala - Section of Act empowers Government to frame scheme for establishment of fund for welfare of fishermen – Sub section out contributions which shall be credited to fund – Held, Reverting to question whether fish meat is different from fish it was vehemently argued on behalf of respondents that since respondents were carrying on business in meat fish they could not be deemed to be persons who were processing fish for export or they were dealers who were carrying on business in fish - Counsel submitted that fish means fish taken out from water and not fish which has been processed after its tail and head are cut or they are sliced or their shell removed etc - Submission ignores common understanding of word fish - Fish whether in raw form or processed form is known as fish - In court busters Comprehensive Dictionary one of meaning of fish is flesh of fish used as food - Fish after cleaning cutting of head and tail or dispelling remains fish - Person dealing in fish meat is dealer in fish - In an American decision East Texas Motor Freight Lines v - Frozen Food Express Law was held that chicken and dressed chicken were not commercially different commodities - Decision was relied on by this Court - of Sales Tax Law Board of Revenue Taxes Ernakulum Food Packers Supp deciding whether washing removing inedible portion storing and filling in cans and adding preservation resulted in bringing out change in pineapple so that it became new commodity - Answer was in negative - Therefore cleaning dispelling cutting head and tail etc of fish may be at more than one stages but that did not result in bringing out different commodity - It was fish when it was taken out from water - It remained fish when respondents purchased it from agents and processed it for export – Appeal disposed
JUDGMENT
R. M. SAHAI, J.:—Fishing and its export is a flourshing trade in the State of Kerala. Its rare varieties of shrimps, lobsters, cuttle fish and squid etc, are exported on large scale. The persons involved in it are fishermen, the agents who purchase from fishermen or those who deshell or clean and cut the fish and exporters or those who carry on business of buying and selling fish, or processing fish for export or are commission agents and brokers or non- residents. The condition of fishermen of whom 90% are traditional fishermen is miserable. Their pathetic condition was described in a report published by the Fisheries Department in 1980 thus,
"They are all traditionally downtrodden and illiterate and hence subjected to indebtedness and hardships as well as exploitation by middlemen. It is a painful fact that, through the implementation of various plan schemes for past 30 years no substantial changes have been brought about in improving their living conditions."
In a study carried on by the State in 1987 it was found that the per capita income of fishermen was not even half of normal per capita income of ordinary person in the State. Therefore, the State enacted The Kerala Fishermens Welfare Fund Act, 1985(Act for short) which was assented to by the President of India on 10-2-1985. The Act provides for constitution of a welfare fund for promotion of welfare of fishermen in the State of Kerala. Section 3 of the Act empowers the Government to frame a scheme for establishment of a fund for the welfare of fishermen. Sub-section (2) of Section 3 gives out the contributions which shall be credited to the fund. They comprise of contributions specified in Section 4, fee levied under the schemes, damages realised under Section 21, grants or loans or advances made by the Government of India or the State Government, any penalty levied under the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980 and any amount raised by the Board from other sources. Sub-section (3) vests the fund in the Board which under Clause (a) of Section 2 means, the Kerala Fishermens Welfare Fund Board constituted under Section 7. And sub-section (4) provides for utilization of the fund for distress relief to fishermen in times of natural calamities, for payment of financial assistance to fishermen who suffer permanent or temporary disablement, to advance loans or grants to meet the expenses in connection with disease or death of dependants, or any unexpected expenditure or day to day expenditure during lean months, to provide for the fishermen and their family members education, vocational, training, employment etc., for payment of financial assistance, for suffered of houses or fishing implements or any other damages due to natural calamities or other unexpected causes, to provide old age assistance, and for implementation of any other purposes specified in the scheme. Section 4 specifies the persons and the rate at which they shall contribute to the fund. The contribution has to be made by fishermen, owners of fishing vessel, fishing net, owners of prawn filtration area, persons who employ fishermen in a fishing vessel. The provision for contribution by a dealer reads as under :-
"S. 4. - Contribution to the fund.-
(1) .....................
(2) A dealer shall contribute every year to the fund one per cent of his sale proceeds in the year,
Provided that the Board shall fix upon such members as may be specified in the scheme, the amount which a dealer shall contribute every year to the fund, for a period of three years from the commencement of this Act.
Provided further that the amount fixed under the preceding proviso shall not exceed one per cent of the sale proceeds of the dealer."
The other relevant Sections are 7 and 12. The former provides for constitution of the Board and the latter lays down the procedure for determination of contribution. It empowers the authorities to determine the amount from person liable to contribute after making inquiry as the authority m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.